Skip to main content

I was wrong about cloud gaming. One small setup change showed me the light

Xbox Windows 10 Remote Play
Microsoft / Xbox

I never had much faith in cloud gaming.

The reality of current internet infrastructure and reliability just felt — and in many ways still feels — too far off for streaming to provide a close enough experience to the “real” thing for gamers to accept. I even gave it my best shot to change my mind one year ago this week by committing to only playing games via cloud for an entire week. What I found was that, in my situation, there were only select games where the input delay was tolerable enough to consider it as a primary way to play. It’s a great option for those who can’t get expensive hardware, but it wouldn’t find an audience among the hardcore gamers who have better alternatives.

Recommended Videos

One year later, I admit that I was wrong about cloud gaming. That’s not because I buffed up my internet speed to better handle the tech. Instead, one small Wi-Fi change showed me what I was missing.

It goes up to 6

The only meaningful change to my setup between a year ago and today is a new router. It wasn’t my intention to solve this issue when I purchased a gaming router, specifically the Reyee E6 AX6000. I simply needed a new one after my old router bit the dust. I figured I would invest in something that would be future-proof for a while. I had heard of Wi-Fi 6 and how it was supposedly a much more stable connection for gaming, but it wasn’t at the top of my mind when making my purchase.

Because of the nature of my job, I spend a lot of time bouncing between my console and computer working on guides and other coverage of games. After that experimental week last year, I didn’t really try to stream games to my PC for work much. It would be incredibly convenient, but the picture quality would degrade in minutes, and not long afterward, the entire connection would cut and I would have to reconnect and repeat the cycle. Instead, I only relied on it to make capturing and moving screenshots easier.

Then I gave it another try with my new router.

The Reyee E6 router.
Reyee

When I say my experience was night and day, I mean it with as little exaggeration as possible. I couldn’t believe that the quality difference was so vast on the exact same internet in the same location, but just using a different router. I never lost connection once using remote play or cloud streaming. And I never even had to drop the resolution to maintain that stability.

The improved input lag was the biggest revelation. No, it wasn’t gone. I don’t believe that is possible unless you’re in the most ideal circumstances regarding connection and distances to servers. However, it was as minimal as I had ever experienced. Previously, I felt as though I had to play one step ahead of the game — predicting what I needed to do and performing the action before I saw the cues or I would be late. Now, with the exception of situations where nearly frame-perfect reaction is required, there’s no challenge I feel is made impossible because of input lag. I’ve beaten bosses in Stellar Blade and nailed all of Tales of Kenzera: Zau’s platforming challenges with about as little issue as I would playing natively.

My main gripe with cloud gaming came down to access. I knew the experience I am having now was possible, but thought it was only available to those in locations with access to, and the ability to afford, top-of-the-line internet speeds. This one upgrade has completely changed my outlook on where cloud gaming could fit into the industry now that I’ve seen firsthand that you don’t necessarily need a gigabit connection to achieve amazing results.

I’ll stand by my claim for now that some games will just never be ideal on cloud, such as fighters, rhythm games, or anything that demands near-perfect timing. I’d love to be proven wrong on that front a year from now. Until then, I’m willing to be more open to tech I was too overeager to write off.

Jesse Lennox
Jesse Lennox has been a writer at Digital Trends for over four years and has no plans of stopping. He covers all things…
Another one! Amazon could announce game-streaming service in 2020
green gaming report us gamers global warming climate change

Google Stadia just launched this week, and the game-streaming service has already been criticized for a poor game selection, sub-par performance, questionable pricing and business practices, and even for killing Chromecast Ultra units. These issues appear to be no worry to Amazon, however, as it appears the retail and tech behemoth is preparing to announce its own competing service in 2020.

CNET reported this week that Amazon will announce a game-streaming service next year, and that it has already begun recruiting staff from other major technology companies as it moves toward launch. Unsurprisingly, the plan is for the unnamed service to integrate with Twitch streaming and other Amazon services. Google heavily implemented YouTube into Stadia, with options to start a game from a streamer's save state or jump into their multiplayer session right from a stream. Neither of these features is available at launch, however.

Read more
Quiz: Can you tell the difference between these PS5 and PS5 Pro screenshots?
A PS5 Pro that's floating in front of a gray background. It's turned to the side.

Ever since the PlayStation 5 Pro was first revealed, I've seen a common refrain from some skeptics: "I don't see a difference!"

I was in the same boat when Mark Cerny introduced the console in a YouTube video back in September. A compressed YouTube stream just isn't the best way to communicate a console that both increases resolution and frame rate. I only started to see just how different the PS5 Pro looks compared to the base model once I could see them side by side in my own home. It took me some time -- and a lot of eye straining -- to spot some of the finer details outside of its more obvious AI-upscaling benefits, but I was able to see them eventually. The PS5 Pro does improve image quality, but is the bump enough to justify a $700 purchase?

Read more
Battle Aces was born from a rejected StarCraft 2 expansion pitch
Art from the reveal trailer for Battle Aces.

The fast-paced real-time strategy (RTS) game Battle Aces was inspired by an idea that game director David Kim had while working on StarCraft 2 at Blizzard Entertainment.

“Why can’t there be an RTS game that gets rid of all these tedious clicks and focuses on the fun factors?” Kim recalled thinking. “There was a point during Legacy of the Void’s development where we seriously considered cleaning up all of those things and made an RTS game that’s really focused on the fun. But the conclusion was that we should not switch up what StarCraft 2 is on the last expansion of the game.”

Read more